Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosopher... Info

The book aims to defend "rationality" and scientific standards against what they view as a relativistic, "anything goes" approach to knowledge. 2. Targets of the Critique

The article was published, which Sokal argued showed that the journal’s editors lacked scientific rigor and were willing to publish nonsense as long as it used the right postmodern jargon. 4. Key Takeaways Intellectual Impostures: postmodern philosopher...

Critiqued for misuse of mathematical concepts like topology. The book aims to defend "rationality" and scientific

A summary of the specific regarding a particular philosopher (e.g., Lacan or Deleuze)? The counter-arguments or responses from postmodern critics? More details on the Sokal hoax article itself? EU-E-Law, Lao Tzu and Law Teachers in the CT Age - BILETA Intellectual Impostures: postmodern philosopher...